TY - BOOK AU - Love, Jeffrey N TI - Factors that influence medical student selection of an emergency medicine residency program: implications for training programs SN - 1069-6563 KW - *Career Choice KW - *Emergency Medicine/ed [Education] KW - *Internship and Residency KW - *Students, Medical/px [Psychology] KW - Adult KW - Cross-Sectional Studies KW - Female KW - Humans KW - Male KW - Professional Practice Location KW - Questionnaires KW - United States KW - MedStar Washington Hospital Center KW - Emergency Medicine KW - Journal Article KW - Multicenter Study N1 - Available online from MWHC library: 1997 - present, Available in print through MWHC library:2005-2007 N2 - CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of applicants to EM residency programs employed a balance of geographic location factors with individual program factors in selecting a residency program. Specific program characteristics represent the greatest opportunity to maximize the success of the immediate interview experience/season, while others provide potential for strategic planning over time. A working knowledge of these results empowers program directors to make informed decisions while providing an appreciation for the limitations in attracting applicants. 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine; METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, multi-institutional study that anonymously surveyed U.S. allopathic applicants to EM training programs. It took place in the 3-week period between the 2011 National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) rank list submission deadline and the announcement of match results; OBJECTIVES: An understanding of student decision-making when selecting an emergency medicine (EM) training program is essential for program directors as they enter interview season. To build upon preexisting knowledge, a survey was created to identify and prioritize the factors influencing candidate decision-making of U.S. medical graduates; RESULTS: Of 1,525 invitations to participate, 870 candidates (57%) completed the survey. Overall, 96% of respondents stated that both geographic location and individual program characteristics were important to decision-making, with approximately equal numbers favoring location when compared to those who favored program characteristics. The most important factors in this regard were preference for a particular geographic location (74.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 72% to 78%) and to be close to spouse, significant other, or family (59.7%, 95% CI = 56% to 63%). Factors pertaining to geographic location tend to be out of the control of the program leadership. The most important program factors include the interview experience (48.9%, 95% CI = 46% to 52%), personal experience with the residents (48.5%, 95% CI = 45% to 52%), and academic reputation (44.9%, 95% CI = 42% to 48%). Unlike location, individual program factors are often either directly or somewhat under the control of the program leadership. Several other factors were ranked as the most important factor a disproportionate number of times, including a rotation in that emergency department (ED), orientation (academic vs. community), and duration of training (3-year vs. 4-year programs). For a subset of applicants, these factors had particular importance in overall decision-making UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01323.x ER -