TY - BOOK AU - Gutman, Robert E TI - The pelvic floor complication scale: a new instrument for reconstructive pelvic surgery SN - 0002-9378 KW - *Patient Satisfaction KW - *Pelvic Floor/su [Surgery] KW - *Postoperative Complications/di [Diagnosis] KW - *Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/ae [Adverse Effects] KW - *Uterine Prolapse/su [Surgery] KW - Adult KW - Aged KW - Female KW - Humans KW - Middle Aged KW - Quality of Life KW - Questionnaires KW - Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/mt [Methods] KW - Treatment Outcome KW - MedStar Washington Hospital Center KW - Obstetrics and Gynecology/Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery KW - Journal Article KW - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural KW - Validation Studies N1 - Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006 N2 - CONCLUSION: The PFCS compares favorably to the validated modified Clavien-Dindo instrument.Copyright � 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved; OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a unique, new pelvic floor surgery complication scale and compare it with an existing validated measure; RESULTS: We calculated PFCS scores for 977 subjects. Higher PFCS and Clavien-Dindo scores similarly were associated with longer length of hospitalization (P < .01), lower satisfaction (P < .01), lower Health Utilities Index scores (P = .02), lower short form-36 scores (P = .02), higher urogenital distress Inventory scores (P < .01), and incontinence impact questionnaire scores (P < .01) at 3 months. No associations were present at 1 year; STUDY DESIGN: Surgeons from 2 clinical trials networks rated complications based on perceived patient bother, severity, and duration of disability to develop a pelvic floor complication scale (PFCS). PFCS scores were calculated for subjects in 2 multicenter pelvic floor surgical trials. The PFCS and modified Clavien-Dindo scores were evaluated for associations with length of hospitalization, satisfaction, and quality-of-life measures (health utilities index, short form-36, urogenital distress inventory, and incontinence impact questionnaire) UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.889 ER -