TY  - BOOK
AU  - Desale, Sameer
AU  - Mete, Mihriye
TI  - Low cholesterol efflux capacity and abnormal lipoprotein particles in youth with type 1 diabetes: a case control study
SN  - 1475-2840
PY  - 2018///
KW  - *Cholesterol, HDL/bl [Blood]
KW  - *Cholesterol, LDL/bl [Blood]
KW  - *Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/bl [Blood]
KW  - Adolescent
KW  - Age Factors
KW  - Biomarkers/bl [Blood]
KW  - Case-Control Studies
KW  - Child
KW  - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW  - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/di [Diagnosis]
KW  - Female
KW  - Humans
KW  - Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
KW  - Male
KW  - Prognosis
KW  - Young Adult
KW  - MedStar Health Research Institute
KW  - Journal Article
N1  - Available online through MWHC library: 2002 - present
N2  - BACKGROUND: Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) have increased mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). Risk factors for CVD include an elevation of LDL (LDLp) and small HDL (sHDLp) particles, and a decrease in reverse cholesterol transport i.e. HDL-cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC). Our objective was to compare lipoprotein particles and CEC between T1DM and healthy controls (HC) and to explore the associations between NMR lipid particles and cholesterol efflux; CONCLUSIONS: Youth with T1DM demonstrated a more atherogenic profile including higher sHDL and LDLp and lower CEC. Future efforts should focus on considering adding lipoprotein particles and CEC in CVD risk stratification of youth with T1DM. Trial registration Clinical Trials Registration Number NCT02275091; METHODS: 78 patients with T1DM and 59 HC underwent fasting lipoprotein profile testing by NMR and measurements of CEC by cell-based method. The associations between NMR lipid particles with CEC were analyzed using multivariable linear regression models; RESULTS: Youth with T1DM had higher total LDLp 724 [(563-985) vs 622 (476-794) nmol/L (P = 0.011)] (Maahs et al. in Circulation 130(17):1532-58, 2014; Shah et al. in Pediatr Diabetes 16(5):367-74, 2015), sHDLp [11.20 (5.7-15.3) vs 7.0 (3.2-13.1) mumol/L (P = 0.021)], and lower medium HDLp [11.20 (8.5-14.5) vs 12.3 (9-19.4), (P = 0.049)] and lower CEC (0.98 +/- 0.11% vs 1.05 +/- 0.15%, P = 0.003) compared to HC. Moreover, CEC correlated with sHDLp (beta = - 0.28, P = 0.045) and large HDLp (beta = 0.46, P < 0.001) independent of age, sex, ethnicity, BMIz, HbA1c, hsCRP and total HDLp in the diabetic cohort
UR  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-018-0802-0
ER  -