TY - BOOK AU - Crossley, Jason R TI - Association Between Conflict of Interest and Published Position on Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Sleep Apnea SN - 0194-5998 PY - 2021/// KW - *Conflict of Interest/ec [Economics] KW - *Electric Stimulation Therapy KW - *Financial Support/es [Ethics] KW - *Hypoglossal Nerve KW - *Sleep Apnea Syndromes/th [Therapy] KW - Cross-Sectional Studies KW - Humans KW - Retrospective Studies KW - MedStar Washington Hospital Center KW - Otolaryngology KW - Journal Article N1 - Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006 N2 - CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates an association between published position on hypoglossal nerve stimulator use and financial conflict with the device manufacturer. Several undeclared conflicts were also found, suggesting a role for independent search for conflicts during the review process; METHODS: A Google Scholar search was performed for editorials and reviews citing the 2014 New England Journal of Medicine article on hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. Included articles were coded as favorable or neutral. Conflict of interest was recorded as declared by the authors in these articles and as independently searched in the Open Payments registry; OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is an association between authors' financial conflict of interest and published position on clinical use of hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea; RESULTS: Sixteen articles from 45 independent authors were analyzed. Nine articles by authors were coded as favorable. Among authors of articles with favorable views, 16 (59%) had a financial conflict of interest with the manufacturer of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator device, as opposed to only 1 of 21 (5%) authors of neutral/unfavorable articles. When we included only authors to whom payments could be identified or excluded on Open Payments, 16 of 20 (80%; 95% CI, 62%-98%) authors of favorable articles had a financial conflict, while 1 of 10 (10%; 95% CI, 0%-29.6%) of neutral/unfavorable articles did (P = .004); SETTING: International roster of authors and articles analyzed; STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599820982914 ER -