The Impact of Aortic Angulation on Contemporary Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes. - 2021

Available online through MWHC library: 2008 - present

BACKGROUND: AA >=48degree has been reported to adversely influence accurate THV deployment, procedural success, fluoroscopy time, and paravalvular leak (PVL) in patients undergoing TAVR with early generation self-expanding (SE) THVs. CONCLUSIONS: AA no longer plays a role with new-generation BE or SE THVs in contemporary TAVR practice. AA >=48degree did not affect procedural success or in-hospital outcomes and should no longer be a consideration when determining THV selection. Copyright (c) 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted among 841 patients across all risk strata who underwent transfemoral TAVR using the balloon-expandable (BE) SAPIEN 3 or the SE CoreValve Evolut PRO from 2015 to 2020. The previously published cutoff of 48degree was used to analyze procedural success and in-hospital outcomes according to THV type. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to investigate the impact of AA on an in-hospital composite outcome (need for >1 THV, more than mild PVL, new permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke, and death). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the degree of aortic angulation (AA) affects outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using newer-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs). RESULTS: AA >=48degree did not influence outcomes in patients with BE THVs. Additionally, AA >=48degree did not influence procedural success (99.1% vs. 99.1%; p = 0.980), number of THVs used (1.02 vs. 1.04; p = 0.484), rates of more than mild PVL (0.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.486), new permanent pacemaker implantation (11.8% vs. 17.1%; p = 0.178), in-hospital stroke (3.9% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.298), or in-hospital death (0.4% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.980) in patients with SE THVs. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated similar outcomes irrespective of AA, with areas under the curve of 0.5525 for SE THVs and 0.5115 for BE THVs.


English

1936-8798

10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.027 [doi] S1936-8798(21)00484-2 [pii]


*Aortic Valve Stenosis
*Heart Valve Prosthesis
*Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Aortic Valve Stenosis/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
Aortic Valve Stenosis/su [Surgery]
Aortic Valve/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
Aortic Valve/su [Surgery]
Fluoroscopy
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Prosthesis Design
Risk Factors
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/ae [Adverse Effects]
Treatment Outcome


MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute
MedStar Washington Hospital Center


Advanced Cardiac Catheterization Research Fellowship
Interventional Cardiology Fellowship


Journal Article