000 | 03287nam a22005657a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 130913s20132013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng dOvid Technologies | ||
022 | _a0732-8893 | ||
040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
099 | _a23357290 | ||
245 | _aAssessment of ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae: insights from two randomized trials. | ||
251 | _aDiagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease. 75(3):298-303, 2013 Mar. | ||
252 | _aDiagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 75(3):298-303, 2013 Mar. | ||
253 | _aDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease | ||
260 | _c2013 | ||
260 | _fFY2013 | ||
266 | _d2013-09-17 | ||
520 | _aCeftaroline fosamil resulted in higher cure rates than ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in 2 randomized trials (FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2). The present analysis examines the subgroup of patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae infection to determine whether the apparent difference in cure rates persists after adjusting for potential covariates. We retrospectively pooled subjects with S. pneumoniae isolated at baseline in the original studies and employed logistic regression to evaluate the independent relationship between clinical cure and treatment with ceftaroline. Covariates evaluated included demographics, severity of illness, bacteremia, and pathogen characteristics. The final cohort included 139 subjects (69 ceftaroline, 70 ceftriaxone). Unadjusted cure rates were 85.5% and 68.6% (P = 0.009) in the ceftaroline and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. After logistic regression, ceftaroline remained associated with higher cure rates. Our findings indicate that ceftaroline may result in improved outcomes of S. pneumoniae pneumonia. Formal clinical trials are warranted to confirm this hypothesis. Copyright 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _a*Anti-Bacterial Agents/tu [Therapeutic Use] | ||
650 | _a*Cephalosporins/tu [Therapeutic Use] | ||
650 | _a*Community-Acquired Infections/dt [Drug Therapy] | ||
650 | _a*Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/dt [Drug Therapy] | ||
650 | _aAged | ||
650 | _aAged, 80 and over | ||
650 | _aBacteremia/dt [Drug Therapy] | ||
650 | _aBacteremia/mi [Microbiology] | ||
650 | _aCeftriaxone/tu [Therapeutic Use] | ||
650 | _aCommunity-Acquired Infections/mi [Microbiology] | ||
650 | _aFemale | ||
650 | _aHumans | ||
650 | _aLogistic Models | ||
650 | _aMale | ||
650 | _aMicrobial Sensitivity Tests | ||
650 | _aMiddle Aged | ||
650 | _aOdds Ratio | ||
650 | _aPneumonia, Pneumococcal/mi [Microbiology] | ||
650 | _aRetrospective Studies | ||
650 | _aTreatment Outcome | ||
651 | _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aMedicine/Pulmonary-Critical Care | ||
657 | _aClinical Trial, Phase III | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
657 | _aMulticenter Study | ||
657 | _aRandomized Controlled Trial | ||
657 | _aResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | ||
700 | _aShorr, Andrew F | ||
790 | _aEckburg PB, Friedland HD, Kollef M, Llorens L, Shorr AF | ||
856 |
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.002 _zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.002 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
999 |
_c1279 _d1279 |