000 | 04481nam a22006497a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20240807190551.0 | ||
008 | 240807s20242024 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1878-0938 | ||
024 | _aS1553-8389(24)00580-3 [pii] | ||
040 |
_aOvid MEDLINE(R) _cwhc |
||
099 | _a39013705 | ||
245 | _aHigh-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with or without mechanical circulatory support: Will Impella show superiority in the PROTECT IV randomized trial?. | ||
251 | _aCardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2024 Jul 14 | ||
252 | _aCardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Jul 14 | ||
253 | _aCardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions | ||
260 | _c2024 | ||
260 | _fFY2025 | ||
260 | _p2024 Jul 14 | ||
265 | _saheadofprint | ||
265 | _tPublisher | ||
266 | _d2024-08-07 | ||
266 | _z2024/07/16 21:58 | ||
501 | _aAvailable in print through MWHC library: 2002 - present | ||
520 | _aBACKGROUND: PROTECT IV is a current enrolling randomized controlled trial evaluating high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) with prophylactic Impella versus no Impella to reduce the composite primary endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiovascular hospitalization. In a PROTECT IV-like cohort of patients who underwent HR-PCI without Impella, we aimed to report the rate of major adverse events to determine whether the trial is adequately powered. | ||
520 | _aCONCLUSION: Therefore, PROTECT IV estimates that a sample size of 1252 patients is required for Impella to be declared superior to the non-Impella group. Using our observed 2-year outcome of 30.8 %, we estimate that PROTECT IV requires 1966 patients, demonstrating that PROTECT IV is probably underpowered. Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | _aMETHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 700 patients meeting similar inclusion/exclusion criteria of PROTECT IV who underwent HR-PCI without Impella at a single tertiary center from 2008 to 2022 were included in the analysis. The composite rates of all-cause death, MI, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization at 1, 2, and 3 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the results were used to calculate the sample size under the constant hazard ratio assumption and expected number of events to be observed used in planning PROTECT IV. The primary endpoint occurred in 30.8 % of patients at 2 years. PROTECT IV assumes a hazard ratio of 0.75 using a multivariate Cox regression, which, under a 5 % level and 90 % power, yields 516 events. This implies a 2-year primary outcome rate of 50 % for the non-Impella arm. | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | _aIN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED | ||
650 | _zAutomated | ||
651 | _aMedStar Heart & Vascular Institute | ||
651 | _aMedStar Washington Hospital Center | ||
656 | _aAdvanced Cardiac Catheterization Research Fellowship | ||
656 | _aCardiovascular Disease Fellowship | ||
656 | _aInterventional Cardiology Fellowship | ||
657 | _aJournal Article | ||
700 |
_aAbusnina, Waiel _bMWHC _cAdvanced Cardiac Catheterization Research Fellowship _dMBBCh |
||
700 |
_aAhmed, Shaan _bMWHC _cCardiovascular Disease Fellowship _dMD |
||
700 |
_aBanerjee, Avantika _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aBen-Dor, Itsik _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aBernardo, Nelson L _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aCase, Brian C _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aChaturvedi, Abhishek _bMWHC _cAdvanced Cardiac Catheterization Research Fellowship _dMBBS |
||
700 |
_aChitturi, Kalyan _bMWHC _cAdvanced Cardiac Catheterization Research Fellowship _dDO |
||
700 |
_aHaberman, Dan _bMWHC _cInterventional Cardiology Fellowship _dMD |
||
700 |
_aHashim, Hayder _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aLupu, Lior _bMWHC _cInterventional Cardiology Fellowship _dMBA, MD |
||
700 |
_aMerdler, Ilan _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aReddy, Pavan _bMWHC _cAdvanced Cardiac Catheterization Research Fellowship _dMD |
||
700 |
_aRogers, Toby _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aSatler, Lowell F _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aSawant, Vaishnavi _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aWaksman, Ron _bMHVI |
||
700 |
_aZhang, Cheng _bMHVI |
||
790 | _aChitturi KR, Zhang C, Abusnina W, Sawant V, Banerjee A, Ahmed S, Merdler I, Haberman D, Chaturvedi A, Lupu L, Reddy P, Case BC, Rogers T, Hashim HD, Ben-Dor I, Bernardo NL, Satler LF, Waksman R | ||
856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.003 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.003 |
||
942 |
_cART _dArticle _2ddc |
||
999 |
_c14349 _d14349 |