| 000 | 03427nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 170428s20172017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0732-183X | ||
| 040 | _aOvid MEDLINE(R) | ||
| 099 | _a27918725 | ||
| 245 | _aPrevention and Monitoring of Cardiac Dysfunction in Survivors of Adult Cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. | ||
| 251 | _aJournal of Clinical Oncology. 35(8):893-911, 2017 Mar 10 | ||
| 252 | _aJ Clin Oncol. 35(8):893-911, 2017 Mar 10 | ||
| 253 | _aJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology | ||
| 260 | _c2017 | ||
| 260 | _fFY2017 | ||
| 266 | _d2017-05-06 | ||
| 501 | _aAvailable online from MWHC library: 1999 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2008MH - AdultMH - *Heart/pp [Physiopathology]MH - *Heart Diseases/et [Etiology]MH - Heart Diseases/pp [Physiopathology]MH - *Heart Diseases/pc [Prevention & Control]MH - HumansMH - *Neoplasms/pp [Physiopathology]MH - *Neoplasms/th [Therapy]MH - Survivors | ||
| 520 | _aPurpose Cardiac dysfunction is a serious adverse effect of certain cancer-directed therapies that can interfere with the efficacy of treatment, decrease quality of life, or impact the actual survival of the patient with cancer. The purpose of this effort was to develop recommendations for prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult-onset cancers. Methods Recommendations were developed by an expert panel with multidisciplinary representation using a systematic review (1996 to 2016) of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical experience. Study quality was assessed using established methods, per study design. The guideline recommendations were crafted in part using the Guidelines Into Decision Support methodology. Results A total of 104 studies met eligibility criteria and compose the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. The strength of the recommendations in these guidelines is based on the quality, amount, and consistency of the evidence and the balance between benefits and harms. Recommendations It is important for health care providers to initiate the discussion regarding the potential for cardiac dysfunction in individuals in whom the risk is sufficiently high before beginning therapy. Certain higher risk populations of survivors of cancer may benefit from prevention and screening strategies implemented during cancer-directed therapies. Clinical suspicion for cardiac disease should be high and threshold for cardiac evaluation should be low in any survivor who has received potentially cardiotoxic therapy. For certain higher risk survivors of cancer, routine surveillance with cardiac imaging may be warranted after completion of cancer-directed therapy, so that appropriate interventions can be initiated to halt or even reverse the progression of cardiac dysfunction. | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 651 | _aMedStar Heart & Vascular Institute | ||
| 657 | _aJournal Article | ||
| 700 | _aBarac, Ana | ||
| 790 | _aArmenian SH, Barac A, Carver J, Constine LS, Denduluri N, Dent S, Douglas PS, Durand JB, Ewer M, Fabian C, Hudson M, Jessup M, Jones LW, Ky B, Lacchetti C, Lenihan D, Mayer EL, Moslehi J, Oeffinger K, Ray K, Ruddy K | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5400 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5400 |
||
| 942 |
_cART _dArticle |
||
| 999 |
_c2565 _d2565 |
||