000			02239nam a22004097a 4500
008			170731s20172017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a1067-151X
040			_aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099			_a28737619
245			_aRevision Total Elbow Arthroplasty.
251			_aJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 25(8):e166-e174, 2017 Aug
252			_aJ Am Acad Orthop Surg. 25(8):e166-e174, 2017 Aug
253			_aThe Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
260			_c2017
260			_fFY2018
266			_d2017-07-31
501			_aAvailable online from MWHC library: Oct 1993 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - present
520			_aDespite recent technologic advances, total elbow arthroplasty has complication rates higher than that of total joint arthroplasty in other joints. With new antirheumatic treatments, the population receiving total elbow arthroplasty has shifted from patients with rheumatoid arthritis to those with posttraumatic arthritis, further compounding the high complication rate. The most common reasons for revision include infection, aseptic loosening, fracture, and component failure. Common mechanisms of total elbow arthroplasty failure include infection, aseptic loosening, fracture, component failure, and instability. Tension band fixation, allograft struts with cerclage wire, and/or plate and screw constructs can be used for fracture stabilization.
546			_aEnglish
650			_a*Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow/ae [Adverse Effects]
650			_a*Postoperative Complications/su [Surgery]
650			_a*Reoperation/mt [Methods]
650			_aArthritis, Rheumatoid/su [Surgery]
650			_aArthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow/td [Trends]
650			_aElbow Joint
650			_aHumans
650			_aProsthesis Failure
650			_aTreatment Outcome
651			_aMedStar Union Memorial Hospital
651			_aOrthopaedic Surgery
657			_aJournal Article
700			_aMurthi, Anand M
700			_aRamirez, Miguel A
790			_aCheung EV, Murthi AM, Ramirez MA
856			_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00479 _zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00479
942			_cART _dArticle
999			_c3345 _d3345