Dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment in IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
Dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment in IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
- 2018
Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for IVT-treated patients with AIS, DAPP is not associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH. The study lacked the precision to exclude a potentially meaningful increase in sICH bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS: DAPP is not associated with higher rates of sICH and 3-month mortality following IVT. DAPP should not be used as a reason to withhold IVT in otherwise eligible AIS candidates. Copyright (c) 2018 American Academy of Neurology. METHODS: We compared the following outcomes between DAPP+ and DAPP- IVT-treated patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM): symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), and 3-month mortality. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment (DAPP) in a prospective multicenter study. RESULTS: Among 790 IVT patients, 58 (7%) were on DAPP before stroke (mean age 68 +/- 13 years; 57% men; median NIH Stroke Scale score 8). DAPP+ patients were older with more risk factors compared to DAPP- patients. The rates of sICH were similar between groups (3.4% vs 3.2%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders, DAPP was associated with higher odds of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.47; p = 0.005) but also with a higher likelihood of 3-month favorable functional outcome (odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-5.46; p = 0.035). After propensity score matching, 41 DAPP+ patients were matched to 82 DAPP- patients. The 2 groups did not differ in any of the baseline characteristics or safety and efficacy outcomes.
English
0028-3878
10.1212/WNL.0000000000006168 [doi] WNL.0000000000006168 [pii]
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Surgery/Surgical Critical Care
Journal Article
Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1999 - 2006
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for IVT-treated patients with AIS, DAPP is not associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH. The study lacked the precision to exclude a potentially meaningful increase in sICH bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS: DAPP is not associated with higher rates of sICH and 3-month mortality following IVT. DAPP should not be used as a reason to withhold IVT in otherwise eligible AIS candidates. Copyright (c) 2018 American Academy of Neurology. METHODS: We compared the following outcomes between DAPP+ and DAPP- IVT-treated patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM): symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), and 3-month mortality. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment (DAPP) in a prospective multicenter study. RESULTS: Among 790 IVT patients, 58 (7%) were on DAPP before stroke (mean age 68 +/- 13 years; 57% men; median NIH Stroke Scale score 8). DAPP+ patients were older with more risk factors compared to DAPP- patients. The rates of sICH were similar between groups (3.4% vs 3.2%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders, DAPP was associated with higher odds of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.47; p = 0.005) but also with a higher likelihood of 3-month favorable functional outcome (odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-5.46; p = 0.035). After propensity score matching, 41 DAPP+ patients were matched to 82 DAPP- patients. The 2 groups did not differ in any of the baseline characteristics or safety and efficacy outcomes.
English
0028-3878
10.1212/WNL.0000000000006168 [doi] WNL.0000000000006168 [pii]
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Surgery/Surgical Critical Care
Journal Article