MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
03935nam a22003497a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
211101s20212021 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Serial Number |
2211-4599 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
Ovid MEDLINE(R) |
| 099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC) |
|---|
| PMID |
34607917 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Accuracy of Robotic-Assisted Spinal Surgery-Comparison to TJR Robotics, da Vinci Robotics, and Optoelectronic Laboratory Robotics. |
| 251 ## - Source |
|---|
| Source |
International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2021 Oct 04 |
| 252 ## - Abbreviated Source |
|---|
| Abbreviated source |
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct 04 |
| 253 ## - Journal Name |
|---|
| Journal name |
International journal of spine surgery |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Year |
2021 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Manufacturer |
FY2022 |
| 265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE] |
|---|
| Publication status |
aheadofprint |
| 266 ## - Date added to catalog |
|---|
| Date added to catalog |
2021-11-01 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
BACKGROUND: The optoelectronic camera source and data interpolation serve as the foundation for navigational integrity in the robotic-assisted surgical platform. The objective of the current systematic review serves to provide a basis for the numerical disparity that exists when comparing the intrinsic accuracy of optoelectronic cameras: accuracy observed in the laboratory setting versus accuracy in the clinical operative environment. It is postulated that there exists a greater number of connections in the optoelectronic kinematic chain when analyzing the clinical operative environment to the laboratory setting. This increase in data interpolation, coupled with intraoperative workflow challenges, reduces the degree of accuracy based on surgical application and to that observed in controlled musculoskeletal kinematic laboratory investigations. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
CONCLUSIONS: Navigational integrity and maintenance of fidelity of optoelectronic data is the cornerstone of robotic-assisted spinal surgery. Transitioning from controlled laboratory to clinical operative environments requires an increased number of steps in the optoelectronic kinematic chain and error potential. Diligence in planning, fiducial positioning, system registration, and intraoperative workflow have the potential to improve accuracy and decrease disparity between planned and final implant position. The key determining factors limiting navigation resolution accuracy are highlighted by this Cochrane research analysis. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright (c) 2021 ISASS. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
METHODS: Review of the PubMed and Cochrane Library research databases was performed. The exhaustive literature compilation obtained was then vetted to reduce redundancies and categorized into topics of intrinsic optoelectronic accuracy, registration accuracy, musculoskeletal kinematic platforms, and clinical operative platforms. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
RESULTS: A total of 147 references make up the basis for the current analysis. Regardless of application, the common denominators affecting overall optoelectronic accuracy are intrinsic accuracy, registration accuracy, and application accuracy. Intrinsic accuracy of optoelectronic tracking equaled or was less than 0.1 mm of translation and 0.1degree of rotation per fiducial. Controlled laboratory platforms reported 0.1 to 0.5 mm of translation and 0.1degree-1.0degree of rotation per array. There is a huge falloff in clinical applications: accuracy in robotic-assisted spinal surgery reported 1.5 to 6.0 mm of translation and 1.5degree to 5.0degree of rotation when comparing planned to final implant position. Total Joint Robotics and da Vinci urologic robotics computed accuracy, as predicted, lies between these two extremes-1.02 mm for da Vinci and 2 mm for MAKO. |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
|---|
| Language note |
English |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
IN PROCESS -- NOT YET INDEXED |
| 651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME |
|---|
| Institution |
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital |
| 657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION |
|---|
| Medline publication type |
Journal Article |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Local Authors |
Brooks, Daina M |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Local Authors |
Cunningham, Bryan W |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Local Authors |
McAfee, Paul C |
| 790 ## - Authors |
|---|
| All authors |
Brooks DM, Cunningham BW, McAfee PC |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| DOI |
<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8139">https://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8139</a> |
| Public note |
https://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8139 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Koha item type |
Journal Article |
| Item type description |
Article |
