Etiology and Manifestations of Iatrogenesis in Pediatrics. (Record no. 2686)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02150nam a22002537a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 170918s20172017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency Ovid MEDLINE(R)
099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC)
PMID 28846518
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Etiology and Manifestations of Iatrogenesis in Pediatrics.
251 ## - Source
Source AMA Journal of Ethics. 19(8):783-792, 2017 Aug 01
252 ## - Abbreviated Source
Abbreviated source AMA J Ethics. 19(8):783-792, 2017 Aug 01
253 ## - Journal Name
Journal name AMA journal of ethics
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Year 2017
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Manufacturer FY2018
266 ## - Date added to catalog
Date added to catalog 2017-09-18
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract There is general agreement in the literature of what ought to occur following iatrogenic harm. Senior members of the team should disclose what occurred and how the problem will be remedied. Those involved should express heartfelt regrets and apologize sincerely. But in the pediatric setting, parents, as surrogates, can sometimes place clinicians on the horns of a dilemma: respect parental autonomy, which may involve continuing nonadvised therapy, or uphold the patient's best interests, which may indicate another course of care. In other cases, clinicians themselves may initiate or continue care without real benefit. The young patients who may be harmed as a result often cannot understand an explanation, an apology, or, when warranted, receive reparation; what duties are owed them? In this paper, we first discuss iatrogenesis writ large and then propose the formulation of this concept in this latter context, where harm occurs as a result of counterpoise between two or more ethical obligations, which we term counterpoise iatrogenesis. We then articulate its etiology and manifestation through two true cases. We conclude with a re-examination of the meaning and function of autonomy in pediatrics and the designation of secondary victims. Copyright (c) 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Institution Ethics
657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION
Medline publication type Journal Article
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Local Authors Teti, Stowe Locke
790 ## - Authors
All authors Ennis-Durstine K, Silber TJ, Teti SL
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
DOI <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.stas2-1708">https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.stas2-1708</a>
Public note https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.stas2-1708
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal Article
Item type description Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          MedStar Authors Catalog MedStar Authors Catalog 09/18/2017   28846518 28846518 09/18/2017 09/18/2017 Journal Article

Powered by Koha