MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
03426nam a22004337a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
220511s20222022 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Serial Number |
2329-4515 |
| 024 ## - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| Standard number or code |
10.1080/23294515.2022.2040643 [doi] |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
Ovid MEDLINE(R) |
| 099 ## - LOCAL FREE-TEXT CALL NUMBER (OCLC) |
|---|
| PMID |
35259317 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Surrogate Perspectives on Patient Preference Predictors: Good Idea, but I Should Decide How They Are Used. |
| 251 ## - Source |
|---|
| Source |
Ajob Empirical Bioethics. 13(2):125-135, 2022 Apr-Jun. |
| 252 ## - Abbreviated Source |
|---|
| Abbreviated source |
AJOB empir.bioeth.. 13(2):125-135, 2022 Apr-Jun. |
| 252 ## - Abbreviated Source |
|---|
| Former abbreviated source |
AJOB empir.bioeth.. :1-11, 2022 Mar 08 |
| 253 ## - Journal Name |
|---|
| Journal name |
AJOB empirical bioethics |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Year |
2022 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Manufacturer |
FY2022 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Publication date |
2022 Mar 08 |
| 265 ## - SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION/SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS [OBSOLETE] |
|---|
| Publication status |
ppublish |
| 266 ## - Date added to catalog |
|---|
| Date added to catalog |
2022-05-11 |
| 268 ## - Previous citation |
|---|
| -- |
Ajob Empirical Bioethics. :1-11, 2022 Mar 08 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Current practice frequently fails to provide care consistent with the preferences of decisionally-incapacitated patients. It also imposes significant emotional burden on their surrogates. Algorithmic-based patient preference predictors (PPPs) have been proposed as a possible way to address these two concerns. While previous research found that patients strongly support the use of PPPs, the views of surrogates are unknown. The present study thus assessed the views of experienced surrogates regarding the possible use of PPPs as a means to help make treatment decisions for decisionally-incapacitated patients. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Overall, 21 participants supported the idea of using PPPs. The remaining five indicated that they would not use a PPP because they made decisions based on the patient's best interests, not based on substituted judgment. Major themes which emerged were that surrogates, not the patient's preferences, should determine how treatment decisions are made, and concern that PPPs might be used to deny expensive care or be biased against minority groups. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
Surrogates, like patients, strongly support the idea of using PPPs to help make treatment decisions for decisionally-incapacitated patients. These findings provide support for developing a PPP and assessing it in practice. At the same time, patients and surrogates disagree over whose preferences should determine how treatment decisions are made, including whether to use a PPP. These findings reveal a fundamental disagreement regarding the guiding principles for surrogate decision-making. Future research is needed to assess this disagreement and consider ways to address it. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Abstract |
This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to determine the views of experienced surrogates [n = 26] who were identified from two academic medical centers and two community hospitals. The primary outcomes were respondents' overall level of support for the idea of using PPPs and the themes related to their views on how a PPP should be used, if at all, in practice. |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
|---|
| Language note |
English |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
*Advance Directives |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
*Patient Preference |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Decision Making |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Humans |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Judgment |
| 651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME |
|---|
| Institution |
MedStar Washington Hospital Center |
| 656 ## - INDEX TERM--OCCUPATION |
|---|
| Department |
Ethics |
| 657 ## - INDEX TERM--FUNCTION |
|---|
| Medline publication type |
Journal Article |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Local Authors |
Krohmal, Benjamin |
| 790 ## - Authors |
|---|
| All authors |
Candilis P, Dickert NW, Drolen C, Howard D, Krohmal B, Pavlick M, Rivlin A, Wendler D |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| DOI |
<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2040643">https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2040643</a> |
| Public note |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2040643 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Koha item type |
Journal Article |
| Item type description |
Article |
