Development and Assessment of an Inexpensive Smartphone-Based Respiratory Droplet Simulation Model.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Surgical Innovation. 29(2):278-281, 2022 Apr.PMID: 34962218Department: MedStar Georgetown University Hospital/MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Otolaryngology ResidencyForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *COVID-19 | *Smartphone | Cobalt | Coloring Agents | Fluorescein | Humans | Pandemics | Respiratory Aerosols and DropletsYear: 2022Name of journal: Surgical innovationAbstract: Background. Droplet simulation often requires expensive and inaccessible equipment. Herein, we develop and assess a low-cost droplet simulation model using easily accessible materials, open-source software, and a smartphone-based cobalt blue light. Methods. The simulation model was developed using commercial-grade materials and fluorescein dye. A clear face shield was assessed ten times following a simulated cough using fluorescein dye. A conventional ultraviolet Woods lamp was compared to a smartphone-based cobalt blue light to detect fluorescein illumination. Results. The simulation platform and smartphone-based cobalt blue light cost All authors: Chung PS, Hakimi AA, Hutchison DM, J-F Wong B, Kim S, Mesinkovska NA, Park AOriginally published: Surgical Innovation. :15533506211065845, 2021 Dec 28Fiscal year: FY2022Digital Object Identifier: ORCID: Date added to catalog: 2022-02-21
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 34962218 Available 34962218

Background. Droplet simulation often requires expensive and inaccessible equipment. Herein, we develop and assess a low-cost droplet simulation model using easily accessible materials, open-source software, and a smartphone-based cobalt blue light. Methods. The simulation model was developed using commercial-grade materials and fluorescein dye. A clear face shield was assessed ten times following a simulated cough using fluorescein dye. A conventional ultraviolet Woods lamp was compared to a smartphone-based cobalt blue light to detect fluorescein illumination. Results. The simulation platform and smartphone-based cobalt blue light cost 0.18. A Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that the median droplet area of fluorescence under the UV Wood's lamp was not significantly different than that of the smartphone-based cobalt blue light (2.89 vs 2.94, P = .386). Conclusions. This simulation model is inexpensive and easily reproducible. The smartphone application may be a convenient alternative to standard ultraviolet lights. This model has great potential for use in financially restricted academic centers during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

English

Powered by Koha