Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Lancet. 382(9906):1714-22, 2013 Nov 23.PMID: 24004642Institution: MedStar Heart & Vascular InstituteForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | Multicenter Study | Observational Study | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tSubject headings: *Coronary Artery Disease/th [Therapy] | *Drug-Eluting Stents | *Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mt [Methods] | *Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/tu [Therapeutic Use] | Adolescent | Adult | Aged | Death, Sudden, Cardiac/et [Etiology] | Graft Occlusion, Vascular/et [Etiology] | Humans | Middle Aged | Myocardial Infarction/et [Etiology] | Myocardial Reperfusion | Prospective Studies | Treatment Outcome | Young AdultYear: 2013Local holdings: Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1983 - 2007ISSN:
  • 0140-6736
Name of journal: LancetAbstract: BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation increases the risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether risk 130224s over time, depends on the underlying reason for DAPT cessation, or both is unknown. We assessed associations between different modes of DAPT cessation and cardiovascular risk after PCI.FINDINGS: We enrolled 5031 patients undergoing PCI, including 5018 in the final study population. Over 2 years, the overall incidence of any DAPT cessation was 573%. Rate of any discontinuation was 408%, of interruption was 105%, and of disruption was 144%. The corresponding overall 2 year MACE rate was 115%, most of which (74%) occurred while patients were taking DAPT. Compared with those on DAPT, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for MACE due to interruption was 141 (95% CI 094-212; p=010) and to disruption was 150 (114-1.97; p=0004). Within 7 days, 8-30 days, and more than 30 days after disruption, adjusted HRs were 704 (331-1495), 217 (097-488), and 13 (097-176), respectively. By contrast with patients who remained on DAPT, those who discontinued had lower MACE risk (063 [046-086]). Results were similar after excluding patients receiving bare metal stents and using an alternative MACE definition that did not include target lesion revascularisation.FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis. Copyright 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.INTERPRETATION: In a real-world setting, for patients undergoing PCI and discharged on DAPT, cardiac events after DAPT cessation depend on the clinical circumstance and reason for cessation and attenuates over time. While most events after PCI occur in patients on DAPT, early risk for events due to disruption is substantial irrespective of stent type.METHODS: The PARIS (patterns of non-adherence to anti-platelet regimens in stented patients) registry is a prospective observational study of patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation in 15 clinical sites in the USA and Europe between July 1, 2009, and Dec 2, 2010. Adult patients (aged 18 years or older) undergoing successful stent implantation in one or more native coronary artery and discharged on DAPT were eligible for enrolment. Patients were followed up at months 1, 6, 12, and 24 after implantation. Prespecified categories for DAPT cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation, brief interruption (for surgery), or disruption (non-compliance or because of bleeding). All adverse events and episodes of DAPT cessation were independently adjudicated. Using Cox models with time-varying covariates, we examined the effect of DAPT cessation on major adverse events (MACE [composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularisation]). Incidence rates for DAPT cessation and adverse events were calculated as Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to the first event. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00998127.All authors: Alu M, Antoniucci D, Ariti C, Baber U, Berger PB, Chieffo A, Cohen DJ, Colombo A, Dangas G, Gibson CM, Henry TD, Hermiller JB, Iakovou I, Kini AS, Krucoff MW, Mehran R, Moliterno DJ, Pocock S, Sartori S, Shawl F, Steg PG, Stuckey T, Waksman R, Weisz G, Witzenbichler BFiscal year: FY2014Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2014-02-24
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 24004642 Available 24004642

Available online from MWHC library: 1995 - present, Available in print through MWHC library: 1983 - 2007

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation increases the risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether risk 130224s over time, depends on the underlying reason for DAPT cessation, or both is unknown. We assessed associations between different modes of DAPT cessation and cardiovascular risk after PCI.

FINDINGS: We enrolled 5031 patients undergoing PCI, including 5018 in the final study population. Over 2 years, the overall incidence of any DAPT cessation was 573%. Rate of any discontinuation was 408%, of interruption was 105%, and of disruption was 144%. The corresponding overall 2 year MACE rate was 115%, most of which (74%) occurred while patients were taking DAPT. Compared with those on DAPT, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for MACE due to interruption was 141 (95% CI 094-212; p=010) and to disruption was 150 (114-1.97; p=0004). Within 7 days, 8-30 days, and more than 30 days after disruption, adjusted HRs were 704 (331-1495), 217 (097-488), and 13 (097-176), respectively. By contrast with patients who remained on DAPT, those who discontinued had lower MACE risk (063 [046-086]). Results were similar after excluding patients receiving bare metal stents and using an alternative MACE definition that did not include target lesion revascularisation.

FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis. Copyright 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

INTERPRETATION: In a real-world setting, for patients undergoing PCI and discharged on DAPT, cardiac events after DAPT cessation depend on the clinical circumstance and reason for cessation and attenuates over time. While most events after PCI occur in patients on DAPT, early risk for events due to disruption is substantial irrespective of stent type.

METHODS: The PARIS (patterns of non-adherence to anti-platelet regimens in stented patients) registry is a prospective observational study of patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation in 15 clinical sites in the USA and Europe between July 1, 2009, and Dec 2, 2010. Adult patients (aged 18 years or older) undergoing successful stent implantation in one or more native coronary artery and discharged on DAPT were eligible for enrolment. Patients were followed up at months 1, 6, 12, and 24 after implantation. Prespecified categories for DAPT cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation, brief interruption (for surgery), or disruption (non-compliance or because of bleeding). All adverse events and episodes of DAPT cessation were independently adjudicated. Using Cox models with time-varying covariates, we examined the effect of DAPT cessation on major adverse events (MACE [composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularisation]). Incidence rates for DAPT cessation and adverse events were calculated as Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to the first event. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00998127.

English

Powered by Koha