Understanding the System You Are in Is Key to Improving It.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Healthcarepapers. 17(1):38-43, 2017PMID: 29278223Institution: MedStar Institute for InnovationForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Delivery of Health Care/mt [Methods] | *Patient Safety/st [Standards] | *Quality Improvement/st [Standards] | *Safety Management/st [Standards] | Delivery of Health Care/og [Organization & Administration] | Health Personnel/st [Standards] | HumansYear: 2017ISSN:
  • 1488-917X
Name of journal: HealthcarePapersAbstract: Front-line ownership (FLO) is an approach to change that is consistent with what we know about complex adaptive systems (CAS), such as a healthcare organization. Traditional change approaches can fail because they are based in the "organization as a machine" metaphor of traditional, scientific management. Both metaphors have their application. It depends on how closely the work naturally resembles a predictable machine. Often, the drive for detailed standardization is a misguided effort to make a human CAS behave more like a machine, so that our traditional approaches to change will work. FLO is a more appropriate tool in a CAS, where shared agreement at the level of a few simple rules (minimum specifications) and allowing flexibility for adaptation within local context is more appropriate than detailed standardization. Because humans in a CAS maintain some control over their discretionary effort, change advocates desiring sustainable change must work with stakeholders to co-create cases for change that resonate with the values of those being asked to change. FLO facilitates the emergence of this level of understanding of shared values.All authors: Plsek PFiscal year: FY2018Date added to catalog: 2018-01-18
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 29278223 Available 29278223

Front-line ownership (FLO) is an approach to change that is consistent with what we know about complex adaptive systems (CAS), such as a healthcare organization. Traditional change approaches can fail because they are based in the "organization as a machine" metaphor of traditional, scientific management. Both metaphors have their application. It depends on how closely the work naturally resembles a predictable machine. Often, the drive for detailed standardization is a misguided effort to make a human CAS behave more like a machine, so that our traditional approaches to change will work. FLO is a more appropriate tool in a CAS, where shared agreement at the level of a few simple rules (minimum specifications) and allowing flexibility for adaptation within local context is more appropriate than detailed standardization. Because humans in a CAS maintain some control over their discretionary effort, change advocates desiring sustainable change must work with stakeholders to co-create cases for change that resonate with the values of those being asked to change. FLO facilitates the emergence of this level of understanding of shared values.

English

Powered by Koha