Coding and Billing in Surgical Education: A Systems-Based Practice Education Program.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Journal of Surgical Education. 74(2):199-202, 2017 Mar - AprPMID: 27651049Institution: MedStar Harbor HospitalDepartment: MedicineForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Clinical Coding | *Education, Medical, Graduate/mt [Methods] | *Educational Measurement | *Internship and Residency/og [Organization & Administration] | *Problem-Based Learning/og [Organization & Administration] | *Surgery, Plastic/ed [Education] | Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/mt [Methods] | Documentation | Fee-for-Service Plans | Female | Humans | Male | Tertiary Care Centers | United StatesYear: 2017ISSN:
  • 1878-7452
Name of journal: Journal of surgical educationAbstract: CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a series of educational and workflow interventions, which improved resident coding and billing of outpatient clinic encounters. Using externally audited coding data, we demonstrate significantly increased rates of higher complexity E&M coding in a stable patient population based on improved documentation and billing awareness by the residents. Copyright (c) 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.DESIGN: We identified knowledge gaps and barriers to documentation and coding in the outpatient setting. We implemented a series of educational and workflow interventions with a group of 12 residents in a surgical clinic at a tertiary care center. To measure the effect of this program, we compared billing codes for 1 year before intervention (FY2012) to prospectively collected data from the postintervention period (FY2013). All related documentation and coding were verified by study-blinded auditors.OBJECTIVE: Despite increased emphasis on systems-based practice through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies, few studies have examined what surgical residents know about coding and billing. We sought to create and measure the effectiveness of a multifaceted approach to improving resident knowledge and performance of documenting and coding outpatient encounters.PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 12 plastic surgery residents ranging from postgraduate year 2 through postgraduate year 6 participated in the interventional sequence.RESULTS: A total of 1285 patient encounters in the preintervention group were compared with 1170 encounters in the postintervention group. Using evaluation and management codes (E&M) as a measure of documentation and coding, we demonstrated a significant and durable increase in billing with supporting clinical documentation after the intervention. For established patient visits, the monthly average E&M code level increased from 2.14 to 3.05 (p < 0.01); for new patients the monthly average E&M level increased from 2.61 to 3.19 (p < 0.01).SETTING: Interventions took place at the outpatient surgical clinic at Rhode Island Hospital, a tertiary-care center.All authors: Drolet BC, Ghaderi KF, Schmidt STFiscal year: FY2017Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2018-01-18
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 27651049 Available 27651049

CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a series of educational and workflow interventions, which improved resident coding and billing of outpatient clinic encounters. Using externally audited coding data, we demonstrate significantly increased rates of higher complexity E&M coding in a stable patient population based on improved documentation and billing awareness by the residents. Copyright (c) 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DESIGN: We identified knowledge gaps and barriers to documentation and coding in the outpatient setting. We implemented a series of educational and workflow interventions with a group of 12 residents in a surgical clinic at a tertiary care center. To measure the effect of this program, we compared billing codes for 1 year before intervention (FY2012) to prospectively collected data from the postintervention period (FY2013). All related documentation and coding were verified by study-blinded auditors.

OBJECTIVE: Despite increased emphasis on systems-based practice through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies, few studies have examined what surgical residents know about coding and billing. We sought to create and measure the effectiveness of a multifaceted approach to improving resident knowledge and performance of documenting and coding outpatient encounters.

PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 12 plastic surgery residents ranging from postgraduate year 2 through postgraduate year 6 participated in the interventional sequence.

RESULTS: A total of 1285 patient encounters in the preintervention group were compared with 1170 encounters in the postintervention group. Using evaluation and management codes (E&M) as a measure of documentation and coding, we demonstrated a significant and durable increase in billing with supporting clinical documentation after the intervention. For established patient visits, the monthly average E&M code level increased from 2.14 to 3.05 (p < 0.01); for new patients the monthly average E&M level increased from 2.61 to 3.19 (p < 0.01).

SETTING: Interventions took place at the outpatient surgical clinic at Rhode Island Hospital, a tertiary-care center.

English

Powered by Koha