Individualized pelvic physical therapy for the treatment of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence and pelvic pain.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: International Urology & Nephrology. 52(4):655-659, 2020 Apr.PMID: 31807975Institution: MedStar National Rehabilitation NetworkForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Exercise Therapy/mt [Methods] | *Pelvic Floor Disorders/th [Therapy] | *Pelvic Pain/th [Therapy] | *Relaxation Therapy/mt [Methods] | *Urinary Incontinence/th [Therapy] | Aged | Humans | Incontinence Pads | Male | Muscle Relaxation | Muscle Strength | Pain Measurement | Pelvic Floor Disorders/et [Etiology] | Pelvic Floor Disorders/pp [Physiopathology] | Pelvic Floor/pp [Physiopathology] | Pelvic Pain/et [Etiology] | Postoperative Complications/et [Etiology] | Postoperative Complications/pp [Physiopathology] | Postoperative Complications/th [Therapy] | Prostatectomy/ae [Adverse Effects] | Retrospective Studies | Urinary Incontinence/et [Etiology]Year: 2020ISSN:
  • 0301-1623
Name of journal: International urology and nephrologyAbstract: BACKGROUND: The rehabilitation of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence has traditionally focused on pelvic floor strengthening exercise. The goal of this study was to determine whether an individualized pelvic physical therapy (PT) program aimed at normalizing both underactive and overactive pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) can result in improvement in post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic pain.CONCLUSIONS: A majority of post-prostatectomy men with SUI have pelvic floor overactivity in addition to pelvic floor underactivity. An individualized pelvic PT program aimed at normalizing pelvic floor function (as opposed to a pure Kegel strengthening program) can be helpful in reducing SUI and pelvic pain.METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 136 patients with post-prostatectomy SUI and treated with pelvic PT. Patients were identified as having either underactive, overactive, or mixed-type PFD and treated accordingly with a tailored program to normalize pelvic floor function. Outcomes including decrease in SUI as measured in pad usage per day and pain rated on the numeric pain rating scale.RESULTS: Twenty five patients were found to have underactive PFD and were treated with strengthening. Thirteen patients had overactive PFD and were treated with relaxation training. Ninety eight patients had mixed-type PFD and were treated with a combination of relaxation training followed by strengthening. Patients demonstrated statistically significant decrease in pad usage per day (p < 0.001), decreased pelvic pain (p < 0.001), and increased pelvic floor strength (p = 0.049), even in patients who received predominantly pelvic floor relaxation training to normalize pelvic floor overactivity.All authors: Bradley MH, Gosai E, Hynan LS, Lemack G, Roehrborn C, Scott KM, Walton SOriginally published: International Urology & Nephrology. 2019 Dec 05Fiscal year: FY2020Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2020-01-03
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 31807975 Available 31807975

BACKGROUND: The rehabilitation of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence has traditionally focused on pelvic floor strengthening exercise. The goal of this study was to determine whether an individualized pelvic physical therapy (PT) program aimed at normalizing both underactive and overactive pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) can result in improvement in post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic pain.

CONCLUSIONS: A majority of post-prostatectomy men with SUI have pelvic floor overactivity in addition to pelvic floor underactivity. An individualized pelvic PT program aimed at normalizing pelvic floor function (as opposed to a pure Kegel strengthening program) can be helpful in reducing SUI and pelvic pain.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 136 patients with post-prostatectomy SUI and treated with pelvic PT. Patients were identified as having either underactive, overactive, or mixed-type PFD and treated accordingly with a tailored program to normalize pelvic floor function. Outcomes including decrease in SUI as measured in pad usage per day and pain rated on the numeric pain rating scale.

RESULTS: Twenty five patients were found to have underactive PFD and were treated with strengthening. Thirteen patients had overactive PFD and were treated with relaxation training. Ninety eight patients had mixed-type PFD and were treated with a combination of relaxation training followed by strengthening. Patients demonstrated statistically significant decrease in pad usage per day (p < 0.001), decreased pelvic pain (p < 0.001), and increased pelvic floor strength (p = 0.049), even in patients who received predominantly pelvic floor relaxation training to normalize pelvic floor overactivity.

English

Powered by Koha