Utility of erector spinae plane block in thoracic surgery.

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Journal Of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 15(1):91, 2020 May 12.PMID: 32398105Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Anesthesiology | Surgery/General Surgery | Surgery/Thoracic Surgery | Surgery/Trauma SurgeryForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Anesthetics, Local | *Musculoskeletal Pain/th [Therapy] | *Nerve Block/mt [Methods] | *Pain Management/mt [Methods] | *Paraspinal Muscles | *Ropivacaine | Adult | Aged | Aged, 80 and over | Enhanced Recovery After Surgery | Female | Humans | Male | Middle Aged | Musculoskeletal Pain/et [Etiology] | Rib Fractures/co [Complications] | Thoracic Surgical Procedures | ThoraxYear: 2020Local holdings: Available online through MWHC library: 2006 - 2007ISSN:
  • 1749-8090
Name of journal: Journal of cardiothoracic surgeryAbstract: BACKGROUND: Thoracic surgeons have been incorporating enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols into their practices, not only to reduce narcotic usage but also to improve complication rates and decrease lengths of stay. Here, we describe the utility of a regional block technique that can be used for patients undergoing urgent or elective thoracic surgical procedures or suffering from rib fractures.CONCLUSIONS: Regional blocks, such as the ESP block, complement fundamental ERAS principles and serve as an adjunct to the available armamentarium for non-narcotic ways to control pain in thoracic surgical and chest trauma patients. Continued collaboration between the thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists is needed for its success.METHODS: We report our initial one-year experience with these erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks.RESULTS: ESP blocks were placed in 42 patients. The procedure was performed by a trained team of anesthesiologists and certified nurse practitioners. It included placement of a catheter on the ipsilateral chest, followed by a 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine bolus and continuous infusion. Patients were then followed by the regional team, as long as the catheter was in place. While it had some technical challenges, the block was effective in 83.3% of patients with no reported mortality or major complications. However, given the confounding factors of the study (such as simultaneous implementation of ERAS protocol) and heterogeneity of the patient population, a control group was difficult to ascertain and meaningful opioid consumption analysis was difficult to perform.All authors: Begin EV, Boyer JM, Comolli K, Eger CM, Fujiwara W, Henderson HR, Khaitan PG, Lazar JF, Phillips DG, Pirsaharkhiz N, Rubinstein AJ, Stasiewicz S, Trankiem CT, Watson TJOriginally published: Journal Of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 15(1):91, 2020 May 12.Fiscal year: FY2020Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2020-07-09
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 32398105 Available 32398105

Available online through MWHC library: 2006 - 2007

BACKGROUND: Thoracic surgeons have been incorporating enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols into their practices, not only to reduce narcotic usage but also to improve complication rates and decrease lengths of stay. Here, we describe the utility of a regional block technique that can be used for patients undergoing urgent or elective thoracic surgical procedures or suffering from rib fractures.

CONCLUSIONS: Regional blocks, such as the ESP block, complement fundamental ERAS principles and serve as an adjunct to the available armamentarium for non-narcotic ways to control pain in thoracic surgical and chest trauma patients. Continued collaboration between the thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists is needed for its success.

METHODS: We report our initial one-year experience with these erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks.

RESULTS: ESP blocks were placed in 42 patients. The procedure was performed by a trained team of anesthesiologists and certified nurse practitioners. It included placement of a catheter on the ipsilateral chest, followed by a 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine bolus and continuous infusion. Patients were then followed by the regional team, as long as the catheter was in place. While it had some technical challenges, the block was effective in 83.3% of patients with no reported mortality or major complications. However, given the confounding factors of the study (such as simultaneous implementation of ERAS protocol) and heterogeneity of the patient population, a control group was difficult to ascertain and meaningful opioid consumption analysis was difficult to perform.

English

Powered by Koha